TITLE: NEPAL HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES, 1994 AUTHOR: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DATE: FEBRUARY 1995 NEPAL Nepal is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary form of government. In 1990 the King, formerly an absolute monarch, legalized political parties and an interim government promulgated a new Constitution. The King retains important residual powers but has dissociated himself from the day-to-day excercise of governing. The democratically elected Parliament consists of the House of Representatives and the National Council. A parliamentary election was held on November 15. Observers considered it free and fair. The election resulted in a victory for the United Marxist and Leninist party (UML), which formed a new government. The national police force maintains internal security, assisted as necessary by the Royal Nepalese Army. Local officials have wide discretion in maintaining law and order. A positive development was police exercise of considerable restraint in handling violent political demonstrations. However, police mistreatment of criminal suspects continued. Nepal is an extremely poor country, with an annual per capita gross domestic product estimated at around $210. Over 80 percent of its 20 million people support themselves by subsistence agriculture. The export of carpets and garments, along with tourism are the major sources of foreign exchange. Foreign aid covers more than half of the development budget. The Government seeks to liberalize the economy and provide a greater role for the private sector. Since the beginning of political reform in 1990, Nepal has progressed in its transition to a more open society with greater respect for human rights. However, problems remain. Police continue to torture detainees. The Government's unwillingness to investigate allegations of police brutality or take actions against those involved remaines a serious concern. The Govenment continues to impose some restrictions on freedom of expression, and trafficking in women and child labor remain serious problems. Women and the lower castes also suffer widespread discrimination. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Political and Other Extrajudicial Killing In January an angry crowd attacked police after a police subinspector poured boiling water on a woman shopkeeper in Jhapa. The police fired on the crowd, killing 1 person and wounding 30. The authorities later suspended the subinspector but took no other actions against him or other officers. The Government refused to investigate police officers responsible for the 1993 killing of more than two dozen persons in leftist-inspired political demonstrations and strikes. However, the Government has compensated the families of some of the victims. Killings by political groups increased during and after the November 15 general elections. In September several members of the radical leftist United People's Front killed a Nepali Congress Party (NCP) worker on his way to a party meeting in Rukum District. On October 27, unknown assailants killed an NCP worker in Dang District. One week later, eyewitnesses claim that senior NCP workers were among those who shot dead three Communist Party workers marching in a procession toward the NCP's office in Dang District. An NCP worker was shot dead on November 5 in Ilam District; the authorities arrested eight members of the National Democratic Party for the killing. According to unconfirmed reports, the police killed two members of the radical United Peoples Front on November 27, after they fired on the police officers in Rolpa District. Reported political killings continued after the election. In December the NCP reported that six of its workers were killed in political violence after the formation of the new Government. b. Disappearance In June police removed from a Kathmandu hospital a student on a hunger fast in protest over government inaction on pollution; the student has not been seen since. In October the Supreme Court issued a writ of habeas corpus, but the police maintained that they were not holding the student. The case remains unsolved. The case of a student activist taken into custody by police in June 1993 also remains unsolved, despite an ongoing inquiry by the Supreme Court. The Government continues to refuse to publish the report of the Disappearances Commission, a body established to investigate all disappearances in the period from December 1960 to the beginning of the political transformation in 1990. Human rights monitors remain skeptical of the Government's claim that the report's findings do not warrant governmental action. They express concern that persons responsible for disappearances remain in positions of authority. c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Although the Constitution prohibits torture, the law does not define torture as a criminal offense. The police commonly use physical abuse to punish suspects or extract confessions. The Government failed to conduct thorough and independent investigations of reports of police brutality, nor did it take significant disciplinary action against officers involved. The Constitution provides for compensation for victims, but a compensation bill introduced in Parliament in 1993 remains in committee. Charges of cruel treatment by police continued in 1994. During periods of political unrest in the spring and summer, the police reportedly abused several persons arrested at leftist-sponsored political protests. However, there were several clear incidents of torture. Police in Patan headquarters kicked and beat on the soles of the feet a foreigner arrested in January for drug trafficking. Several policemen held a stick across his thighs and jumped on it repeatedly, causing temporary paralysis. Police denied that any such abuse occurred, but a doctor examined the man and judged that his allegations were credible. In January a group of policemen beat the hand and leg joints of a man from Bara who filed a complaint against a police officer who allegedly had had an affair with the man's mother. In response, an angry crowd gathered outside the station. The police opened fire and wounded six persons. The authorities transferred the police officer involved in the affair but took no other action. In October the authorities arrested a man in Ilam District and charged him with illegally cutting wood. To extract a confession, forest guards reportedly beat the man, inserted pins under his fingernails, and beat the soles of his feet. The man was released from custody after a court found him not guilty. The authorities continued to harass Tibetan asylum seekers who tried to cross the border from China. In February security forces badly beat a Tibetan apprehended crossing the border near Kodari. Approximately a dozen soldiers repeatedly kicked the man in the face and beat him with rifle butts, which resulted in temporary blindness and the loss of several teeth (see Section 2.d.). Political groups also engaged in physical abuse. Shopkeepers and bus drivers were stoned and beaten by members of leftist opposition parties after they refused to honor nationwide strikes. Overcrowding is common in prisons and authorities sometimes handcuff or fetter detainees. Women are incarcerated separately from men, in equally poor conditions. The Government has not implemented a provision in the 1992 Children's Act calling for the establishment of a juvenile home and juvenile court. Consequently, children are sometimes incarcerated with adults--either as criminals or with an incarcerated parent. In May the Jail Management Department reported that 83 children below the age of 12 years were in prison. There has been improvement in prison conditions. The authorities are more likely to transfer sick prisoners to hospitals than they were in the past. However, because of the inadequacy of medical facilities in the country, the authorities often place the mentally ill in jails under inhumane conditions. d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile The Constitution provides that a suspect must be arraigned or released within 24 hours of arrest, but the police often violate this provision. Under the Public Offenses Act of 1970, the police must obtain warrants for an arrest unless a person is caught in the act of committing a crime. For many offenses, the case must be filed in court within 7 days of arrest. If the court upholds detention, the police are authorized up to 25 days, with a possible 7-day extension, to complete their investigation. The Supreme Court on occasion has ordered the release of detainees held longer than 24 hours without a court appearance. Detainees do not have the legal right to be visited by family members and are permitted access to lawyers only after the authorities file charges. Instead, the granting of access is haphazard and varies from prison to prison. There is a system of bail, but bail is too expensive for most citizens. Under the Public Security Act, the authorities may detain persons who allegedly threaten domestic security and tranquility, amicable relations with other states, and relations between citizens of different classes or religions. Persons detained under the Act are considered in preventive detention and are not brought to trial. In 1994 the authorities used the Act primarily to detain groups of youths and mob leaders in advance of scheduled demonstrations. They released most detainees within 48 hours. Human rights groups report that supporters of the leftist parties are sometimes arrested and detained arbitrarily and subjected to unwarranted criminal investigations because of their political affiliation. Under the 1991 amendments to the Public Security Act, the police are authorized to extend periods of detention after submitting written notices to the Home Ministry. The district court must be notified of a detention within 24 hours and may order an additional 6 months of detention before official charges must be filed. Other laws, including the Public Offenses Act, permit arbitrary detention. This Act and its many amendments cover such crimes as disturbing the peace, vandalism, rioting, and fighting. Under this Act, the Government detained hundreds of civil servants during a 55-day antigovernment strike in 1991. Human rights monitors express concern that the Act vests too much discretionary power in the Chief District Officer (CDO), the highest ranking civil servant in each of the 75 districts. Under the Act, he is authorized to order detentions, issue search warrants, and specify fines and other punishments for misdemeanors without judicial review. Detainees may appeal the decisions of the CDO's. The Constitution prohibits exile, and it is not practiced. e. Denial of Fair Public Trial The judicial system consists of three levels: district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court. The King appoints the judges on recommendations from the Judicial Council, a constitutional body chaired by the Chief Justice. The Council is also responsible for the assignments of judges, disciplinary action, and other administrative matters. The Constitution provides for the right to counsel, protection from double jeopardy and retroactive application of the law, and public trials, except in some security and customs cases. All lower court decisions, including acquittals, are subject to appeal. The Supreme Court is the court of last appeal, but the King may grant pardons or suspend, commute, or remit any sentence. The Supreme Court has increasingly demonstrated its independence. It has ruled that important provisions in the 1992 Labor Act and the 1991 Nepal Citizenship Act are unconstitutional. Appellate and district courts have become increasingly independent, although they sometimes bend to political pressure. Military courts adjudicate cases concerning military personnel who are immune from prosecution in civilian courts. In 1992 the Supreme Court ruled that civilians may no longer be tried in military courts for crimes involving the military. The authorities may prosecute terrorism or treason cases under the Treason Act. Such trials are closed and are heard by specially constituted tribunals. However, there were no such trials in 1994. There is no credible evidence that the Government holds political prisoners. f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence The Government generally respects the privacy of the home and family. Search warrants are required before search and seizure, except in cases involving suspected security and narcotics violations. Under the Police Act of 1955, as amended, the police are authorized to issue warrants for search and seizure. Such warrants must be approved within 24 hours by the Chief District Officer in misdemeanor cases and court judges in felony cases. Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including: a. Freedom of Speech and Press The Constitution specifies that all citizens shall have freedom of thought and expression, and that no news article or any other reading material shall be censored. Nevertheless, the Constitution prohibits speech and writings that would threaten the sovereignty and integrity of the Kingdom; disturb the harmonious relations among people of different castes or communities; promote sedition, defamation, contempt of court, or instigation to commit crime; or contradict decent public behavior or morality. The Press and Publications Act provides for the licensing of publications and the granting of credentials to journalists. The Act includes penalties for violating these requirements. The Act also prohibits publication of material that, inter alia, promotes disrespect toward the King or royal family or undermines the dignity of the King, the integrity and sovereignty of the Kingdom, and security, peace, and order; creates animosity among the different castes amd religions; or adversely affects the good conduct or morality of the public. In 1992 the Government issued regulations amending the Act which established requirements for education and work experience to hold particular jobs in journalism. The regulations also provide a basis for banning foreign publications. There are scores, if not hundreds, of independent newspapers representing points of view across the political spectrum. The two dailies with the largest circulation are government sponsored. Their editors generally reflect government policy, but they occasionally publish articles critical of the Government and recommend alternative policies. The Ministry of Communication occasionally provides editors with guidance. The Government subsidizes newsprint materials to allow un-profitable papers to stay in business. The Government owns and controls the sole radio and television stations. Programming currently reflects a broader range of interests and political viewpoints than before the beginning of the political transformation in 1990, but still closely follows the government line. The Government does not restrict access to foreign radio broadcasts or to the purchase of television satellite dishes. The Broadcast Act of 1993 allows private parties to broadcast television and FM radio. No private FM radio license was granted in 1994 although an application has been pending for months. Two private television cable services began operations in Kathmandu in 1994, carrying foreign entertainment programs only. The Government limits academic freedom to the same parameters as the media. No overt efforts to enforce these limitations were reported in 1994. b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association Although the Constitution provides for freedom of assembly, this right may be restricted by law on such vague grounds as undermining the sovereignty and integrity of the State or disturbing law and order. There were no reports of arrests or detentions for exercising these freedoms in 1994. However, hundreds of persons were arrested before and during violent strikes and demonstrations organized by leftist parties. Protest leaders from radical leftist groups were placed in preventive detention before scheduled demonstrations on a number of occasions. Most were released after the demonstrations finished. c. Freedom of Religion The majority of citizens are Hindu. The Constitution describes Nepal as a Hindu kingdom, although it does not establish Hinduism as the state religion. The Constitution permits the practice of all religions and prohibits discrimination on the basis of caste except for traditional religious practices at Hindu temples. The Government has not interfered with the practice of other religions. There is concern among non-Hindus, however, that a constitutional prohibition against converting another person could be used to limit expression of religious beliefs. The authorities arrested 11 Christians in Ilam District in October for proselytizing near the entrance of a Hindu temple and blocking public access. d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign Travel, Emigration, and Repatriation The Constitution provides for freedom of movement and residence, and the Government generally does not restrict travel abroad. However, the Government restricts travel to some areas on the Chinese border to foreign tourists and foreign residents, such as Tibetan refugees. The Government allows citizens abroad to return home and is not known to revoke citizenship for political reasons. The Government has no official refugee policy and is not party to the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. However, in the past, the Government accepted and assimilated approximately 18,000 Tibetan refugees who still reside in Nepal. In the mid-1970's, the Government ceased issuing identification cards to over 12,000 Tibetan residents. They do not have legal proof that they live in Nepal. Some of these undocumented residents who wished to travel abroad in 1994 faced difficulties from authorities. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has maintained an office in Kathmandu since 1989. The Government aids UNHCR's efforts by facilitating access to refugees from both China and Bhutan. The Governments of Nepal and China tightened movement across their border in 1986, but both sides observe such restrictions haphazardly. The authorities continued to harass Tibetan asylum seekers who tried to cross the border with China. In some cases, border officials demand bribes from would-be refugees (see Section 1.c.). In some instances fighting has occurred between would-be refugees and the police. In August the police fired on a group of 10 Tibetans who crossed the border in the Humla District, injuring 3 persons. One man was wounded by gunfire below the knee and his leg was later amputated. The police claim that they were forced to open fire after the Tibetans attacked them and grabbed their weapons in an attempt to escape The Tibetans claim that the police attempted to rob them. As in previous years, the Government continued to use force to repatriate Tibetans to China against their will. Reliable information is unobtainable, but some reports suggest the problem increased in 1994. Ethnic Nepalese fleeing Bhutan continued to arrive in 1994 (see the report on Bhutan). At year's end, the camps in southeastern Nepal housed 86,000 refugees, with another 15,000 to 20,000 residing outside the camps. These residents represent over one-sixth of Bhutan's estimated population before the exodus. The UNHCR monitors the condition of the Bhutanese refugees and provides assistance for their basic needs. The Government accepts the refugee presence on humanitarian grounds but is able to offer little more than a place to stay. Living conditions in the camps have improved dramatically since 1992. Adequate clean water is available and health, sanitation, and nutrition standards are acceptable. Conditions are actually somewhat better than those found in nearby areas. Consequently violence has sometimes broken out between camp residents and the local population. Relief organizations working in the camps sometimes distribute token relief supplies to local communities to defuse the situation. In 1993 the Governments of Nepal and Bhutan formed a joint committee to resolve the refugee problem and to determine different categories of refugees in preparation for their future repatriation to Bhutan. However, four rounds of talks have led to little concrete progress. Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to Change Their Government After a parliamentary defeat in July, the Prime Minister requested the dissolution of Parliament and called for new elections. The second parliamentary election in three decades was held on November 15. Citizens exercised their right to change their government by voting out the NCP and returning the UML party to power. Although there were some irregularities, observers concluded that overall the elections were free and fair. The UML won 88 seats, the NCP 83, the National Democratic Party 20, the Nepali Workers and Peasants Party 4, and Sadbhavana Party 3, and independents 7. The King invited the UML to form a new government in November. The people, through their elected representatives, have the right to amend the Constitution with the exception of certain basic principles which they may not changed--sovereignty vested in the people, the multiparty system, fundamental rights, and the constitutional monarchy. Parliamentary elections are scheduled every 5 years. Midterm elections may be called if the ruling party loses its majority, or loses a vote of no confidence, or if it calls for elections. Suffrage is universal to all citizens of age 18 and over. The House of Representatives, the lower house, may send legislation directly to the King by a 50-percent vote. The upper house, or the National Council, may amend or reject lower house legislation--although it may introduce legislation and send it to the lower house for consideration. The King exercises certain powers with the advice and consent of the Council of Ministers. These powers include exclusive authority to enact, amend, and repeal laws relating to succession to the throne. The King's income and property are tax-exempt and inviolable, and no question may be raised in any court about any act performed by the King. The Constitution also permits the King to exercise emergency powers in the event of war, external aggression, armed revolt, or extreme economic depression. In such an emergency, the King may suspend without judicial review many basic freedoms including the freedoms of expression and assembly, freedom from censorship, and freedom from preventive detention. However, he may not suspend the right to form associations and of habeas corpus. The King's declaration of a state of emergency must be approved by a two-thirds majority of the lower house of Parliament. If the lower house is not in session, the upper house exercises this power. A state of emergency may be maintained for up to 3 months without legislative approval and up to 6 months, renewable only once for an additional 6 months, if legislative approval is granted. The Constitution bars the registration and participation in elections of any political party based on "religion, community, caste, tribe or region," or that does not operate openly and democratically. There are no specific laws that restrict indigenous peoples, women, or minorities from participating in the Government or political parties, but lingering conservative traditions limit the influence of women and some castes and tribes in the political process. The Constitution requires that each registered party must nominate at least 5 percent of its candidates for the House of Representatives. Women constituted 5 percent of party candidates in the November election. Seven of 250 Members of Parliament are women. Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights There are a dozen nongovernmental human rights organizations, including the Human Rights Organization of Nepal (HURON) and the Informal Sector Services Center (INSEC). The Nepal Law Society also monitors human rights problems, and a number of single-issue nongovernmental organizations (NGO's) focus on specific problem areas such as torture, child labor, women's rights, or ethnic minorities. The police regularly lend vehicles to human rights monitors to observe political demonstrations. However, human rights organizations contend that at times the Government interferes with their operations. For example, in May government personnel entered and inspected the offices of the Kathmandu chapter of Amnesty International. The authorities claimed that they carried out a survey of the office in accordance with administrative norms, but several human rights groups maintained that a warrant was required for such a survey and organized a protest march.